Minutes:
Following concerns expressed by some Members, it was agreed at the Overview and Scrutiny Performance Board (OSPB) on 25 October 2018, that the Panel would invite the Assistant Director of Families, Communities and Partnerships to its meeting to discuss and clarify the detail of the Officer Executive Decision relating to the School Library Service (SLS).
The Assistant Director explained that an Officer Executive decision had been taken on 4 October 2018 to discontinue the SLS. The Panel were referred to the three Member Briefings included in the Agenda which provided details of the history of the service and the process leading up to this decision being made. The SLS had always been a traded service and because of the lack of usage, it was currently being run at a deficit. Previously, 216 schools had bought the service but only 22 schools were now buying it.
The Panel was informed of the many initiatives that had been tried to stimulate business, including raising the profile of the service and attempting to move into new markets. All schools had been written to several times, including encouraging further use of the service and formally consulting them on the future of the service. All this had had very little impact on demand.
The Assistant Director explained that the formal process of de-commissioning the Service had been paused, to allow for the Panel meeting and the consideration of the Notice of Motion to Council the following day to be dealt with.
Discussion points:
· Schools' lack of interest in the service was mainly due to the significant financial pressures they were facing and as a consequence some schools had sought to provide their own libraries or on a shared basis. Many schools also made effective use of digital technology. The Assistant Director confirmed that discussions had taken place with other local authorities and Babcock to gauge whether there was any interest in providing the service to the remaining schools.
· The total cost of the SLS budget was £182,000, which included five members of staff. The service had been losing money and despite best efforts the level of demand had not been able to be increased.
It was agreed that:
Supporting documents: