Agendas, Meetings and Minutes - Agenda and minutes

Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Worcester

Contact: Kate Griffiths, Committee Officer 

Items
No. Item

179.

Apologies

Minutes:

Apologies had been received from Rob Adams, Gareth Prosser, and Juliet Smith. Ellen Footman had sent her apologies but Heather Manning was attending as her substitute.

 

 

180.

Confirmation of the Minutes pdf icon PDF 96 KB

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 7 February were agreed to be a correct record of the meeting and were signed by the Chairman.

181.

Children in Care Council and Youth Voice Team pdf icon PDF 966 KB

Minutes:

Alison introduced representatives from Worcestershire’s Children in Care and Care Leavers Councils, which comprised of Big Voices (0-12), Who Cares We Care (12-18) and Speak Out (16+). The groups represented the views of looked after children. Ollie, Rona and Charlie explained what they had done over the last year. They explained that various activities were organised and numbers attending different events varied depending on the activity.

 

Various events over the year included organising regional events and attending national events and conferences. They were involved in speaking to Ofsted Inspectors, attending the APPG at Westminster, running the annual fun day and helping with the first Corporate Parenting Roadshow.

 

The groups were working to raise the profile of Looked After Children and that encouraged people to ask their opinion on various services. They represent the views of young people and being involved with the groups helped their own confidence and improved their opportunities.

 

They explained that they would continue to do what they were doing by working with the Care Leaver’s Team and using social media to keep people up to date and attract new members. It was difficult to encourage young people to join the groups but it was important that their voices were heard. They hoped to have a good working relationship with Worcestershire Children First in future.

 

During the discussion the followed points were made:

·       The groups made use of twitter and Instagram to communicate with young people. However it was hoped a website could be created in future

·       Various groups offered support to care leavers such as Worcester Arts Workshop and the Youth Engagement Network. The Rees Foundation had opened a Community Café in Kidderminster. It was agreed that the Districts needed to be advertising these to children, young people and professionals

·       The Local Children’s Trust in Kidderminster would like a young person as a member and wished to encourage people to apply

·       Tina Russell reinforced that listening to the Voice of the Child and Looked After Children was important to Worcestershire Children First and was part of their business plan. Barbara Carter and Sally Branchflower were developing ways to collect feedback on placements and following on from the work of Croom and the “What is Home” project and exhibition, Tina was planning a piece of work on telling positive stories of children who have left care

·       Tina Russell shared regional plans for a Peer Review regarding Children in Care Councils within West Midlands authorities as part of the future social sector led improvement.

 

The Chairman thanked the young people for their presentation and appreciated that they were working to attract new representatives.

182.

Kinship Care pdf icon PDF 68 KB

Minutes:

Barbara Carter explained that it was estimated that there were 200,000 children living with kinship carers in the UK. They could be living with Grandparents or other relatives. In 2011 the Government’s Statutory Guidance required each Local Authority to produce a Family and Friends policy and Worcestershire’s was reviewed last year.

 

A range of arrangements were possible:

·       Family fostering, when a child was looked after for a period, but the parents retained parental responsibility

·       Private Fostering where a child lived with a family friend who was not a close family member and the Local Authority assessed the situation regularly

·       Child Arrangements Orders when parental responsibility was shared between the parents and the carers

·       Special Guardianship Orders (SGO) which meant that carers had parental responsibility. The Council offered various services when SGO were in place – funding for the initial legal consultation, set up costs, training and support, and access to 15 hours of free child care from 2 years old

·       Kinship foster Care meant there was a legal requirement for the child to be placed with approved foster carers.

 

There had been a lot of growth for all the areas of kinship care. Worcestershire had 22% of its looked after children in kinship foster care while the national figure was 17%. The workforce had expanded and the service re-designed to better reflect demands in Kinship Care.

 

Barbara Carter highlighted in her report the work of the service on supporting family members as support carers as opposed to assessed foster carers. It was hoped that if services could be involved at an earlier point as part of the edge of care developments then children could be prevented from becoming looked after if it was safe to support them at home/within the family.

 

During the subsequent discussion the following main points were made:

·       That the Kinship Carers UK charity had been set up by Enza Smith who lived in Worcestershire

·       In response to a query about whether the social care team review the support kinship carers receive to see if they were struggling, it was clarified that if they were an approved Family and Friends carer (known as Kinship) they received the same support as Foster Carers

 

 

183.

Priorities for 2019/20

Minutes:

Following the compilation of the list of action points it had been proposed that the Board should concentrate on a number of priorities for 2019/20.

 

1.     Housing – Accommodation for Care Leavers

 

2.     Promoting the Health and Well-being of Looked After Children and Care Leavers

 

3.     Quality and Timeliness of Care and Pathway Planning for Looked After Children and Care Leavers

 

4.     Looked After Children and Care Leavers not in Employment, Education or Training (NEET)

 

5.     Bringing Corporate Parenting Priorities to District Councils

 

6.     Voice of the Child

 

 

Various comments were made by Board Members:

·     More information was required regarding young people who were not in Education, Employment or Training

·     It was important to encourage secondary schools to fulfil their obligations to school leavers

·     It was queried why Worcestershire Children First could not rent suitable accommodation and rent it back to care leavers. It was explained the WCF would not be picking up the housing remit as that sat with District Councils

·     It was felt that some District Councillors did not appreciate that they had a responsibility for Looked After Children – it was not just an issue for Children’s Social Care.

·     It was suggested that the Leaders Board needed to discuss Looked After children – it was pointed out that it had been discussed and work was on-going to try to get flats built

·     The District Housing Representative stated that Corporate Parenting was on the agenda and mentioned in all relevant reports. Training was also booked for all new Councillors

·     Members agreed with priorities 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 but felt priority 3 should be business as usual and should by now have improved.  This is also covered in performance data received by the Board.

 

ACTIONS

 

1)     The priorities and associated activities supported by the work programme would be developed into the business plan for 2019/20 and shared with all members – This would then be reviewed within the work programme.  Tina Russell

 

2)     All district members to ensure mechanisms for raising the priorities/data and any locality offer to Looked After Children and Care Leavers is formally raised at district council meetings. NB: District Officers can attend CPB meetings as public observers if this helps District representatives to take issues back to their districts.

 

 

184.

Quarter 3 Data pdf icon PDF 304 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

It was explained that higher numbers of young people left care in 2017/18 as work to address drift and delay in permanency planning took effect. For new entrants it was confirmed more children were achieving permanency faster than previously.

 

Work on the sufficiency strategy was underway and would re-focus the way residential care was used and look at how the use of internal fostering could be increased.

 

In general, social care now had more stable management. The falling percentage of looked after children with personal education plans had been due to staff sickness and a vacancy but that problem was being resolved.

 

ACTION – The sufficiency Strategy to be presented to a future Board – Tina Russell.

185.

Work Plan pdf icon PDF 59 KB

Minutes:

Noted

186.

Future Meeting Dates

13 June 2019

15-19 July 2019 - Keep in Touch Visits

8 October 2019

27 November 2019

 

All at 2pm at County Hall

 

 

Minutes:

Dates 2019

 

13 June 2019 - 2.00pm

15-19 July 2019 - Keep in Touch Visits

8 October 2019 - 2.00pm

27 November 2019 – 2.00pm